Summary
Macrophages from RA synovial fluids were compared to primary human blood-derived macrophages. Keywords: disease state analysis
Dataset does not meet the current suitability threshold.
Whole-study downloads — these do not apply your sample requirements.
Samples meeting selected requirements: 0 cases / 0 controls
0 case / 3 control samples elsewhere in the study have incomplete or conflicting evidence; they are not included above
Patient pairs verified in indexed sample metadata: 0
A case/control comparison meeting these requirements is not confirmed.
Counts describe samples, not independent patients. Pair verification uses explicit subject identifiers in indexed sample metadata. Zero verified pairs does not establish that the study is unpaired; reported matched-normal design alone is insufficient.
Macrophages from RA synovial fluids were compared to primary human blood-derived macrophages. Keywords: disease state analysis
Macrophages from synovial fluids of five RA patients were isolated by ficoll density gradient centrifugation, followed by positive selection of CD14+ cells using magnetic beads. The patients’ diagnoses were determined by their physicians, in each case a Board-certified rheumatologist at the Hospital for Special Surgery, and were definite RA according to American College of Rheumatology criteria. De-identified samples were processed in an anonymous manner using a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital for Special Surgery. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from venous blood of independent healthy donors by centrifugation on a Ficoll density gradient. Monocytes were obtained from PBMCs using anti-CD14 magnetic beads, and were >96% pure as verified by flow cytometry. Monocytes were differentiated into macrophages by culturing in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and M-CSF (20 ng/ml). The viability and purity of macrophages was comparable in all conditions Gene expression was analyzed using Affymetrix microarrays and protocols.
| Source | Contribution | Status |
|---|---|---|
| GEO |
Original dataset metadata, sample metadata, source links, and GEO data availability flags.
|
Primary source |
| recount3 |
Planned trusted source for processed count availability. |
No match found |
| Expression Atlas |
Planned source for curated expression experiment links. |
No match found |
| PubMed |
Primary GEO citations and related PubMed articles that mention this dataset.
5 linked publications
4 DOIs
Primary publication
Related publications
|
Available |
Both case and control groups are present in the proposed grouping.
Each contrast group has at least 2 samples.
Processed data is marked available in the GEO index.
All samples are assigned to a case or control group.
Warnings are present, but none are critical blockers.
Metadata quality is high enough to support downstream handoff.
No readiness blockers detected.
Siftome proposed case and control labels, but no reviewer confirmation is stored yet.
Open the sample grouping CSV and confirm group labels before analysis.Both groups meet the minimum of 2 samples.
Confirm whether the cohort is large enough for the intended statistical analysis.Processed data availability is marked true in the GEO index.
Verify that downloaded processed files contain usable count or expression identifiers.No review-needed or unassigned samples are present in the proposed grouping.
Review the grouping table for biologically meaningful differences that the automated checks may not detect.No hard-excluded samples were detected by the current rules.
Record any manual exclusions in the downstream analysis notes.The dataset and sample accessions can be traced back to GEO.
Keep GEO accessions with exported metadata.Ask a bioinformatician to review grouping, count availability, exclusions, and design before DE.
Assay context may require expert handling before DESeq2-style analysis.
No active review decisions affect this ranking.
Microarray expression context was detected; compare separately from RNA-seq cohorts.
Microarray datasets are downgraded in the patient-tissue tumor-normal intent unless secondary assays are explicitly enabled.
| Group | Role | Accession | Title | Source / characteristics | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Case | GSM265020 | Rheumatoid arthritis 9252 | RA patient Synovial fluid macrophages | Case marker detected. |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Case | GSM265036 | Rheumatoid arthritis 121102 | RA patient Synovial fluid macrophages | Case marker detected. |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Case | GSM265361 | Rheumatoid arthritis 2-21 | RA patient Synovial fluid macrophages | Case marker detected. |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Case | GSM265363 | Rheumatoid arthritis 1032 | RA patient Synovial fluid macrophages | Case marker detected. |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Case | GSM265366 | Rheumatoid arthritis 1152 | RA patient Synovial fluid macrophages | Case marker detected. |
| Normal tissue | Control | GSM265436 | Normal donors XH1 | Normal donors Blood-derived macrophages | Control marker detected. |
| Normal tissue | Control | GSM265439 | Normal donors XCH1 | Normal donors Blood-derived macrophages | Control marker detected. |
| Normal tissue | Control | GSM265445 | Normal donors TA1 | Normal donors Blood-derived macrophages | Control marker detected. |
Carry Siftome's disease, organism, specimen, assay, data type, and accession into a validation project. Uncertain fields remain Unknown.